Anti-Cannabis Group Files Lawsuit Over Montana Legalization Initiative

Anti-legalization group Wrong for Montana has filed a post-election lawsuit challenging the voter-approved legalization measure claiming the financial allocation provisions in the measure violate the state constitution, the Bozeman Daily Chronicle reports.

Montana voters approved the initiative 57 percent to 43 percent.

Wrong for Montana spokesperson Steve Zabawa, who also serves as the director of SAFE Montana, said the initiative’s wording and promotion are “not transparent” because it proposes that portions of the 20 percent tax on sales be used for conservation, substance abuse treatment, and veterans’ issues.

“Even though this thing got voted in last night doesn’t mean it’s going to be law. There’s a lot more that has to be done, and I think the Montana Supreme Court or the (Helena) District Court will throw this thing out.” – Zabawa to the Daily Chronicle

Dave Lewis, policy advisor to New Approach Montana and former Montana legislator, defended those allocations, telling the Daily Chronicle that the earmarking of funds are proposals – not part of the law – that require legislative approval.

“The Legislature is the only body of the (government) that can appropriate money. We’re not challenging that,” he said in the report. “If one part of this is unconstitutional, everything else still stands. [Zabawa’s] suing to say it’s unconstitutional, the way we talked about the money. Well, if we throw that out, then all the money just goes to the general fund.”

Prior to the election, the state Supreme Court rejected a similar lawsuit brought by Wrong for Montana regarding the appropriation of funds under the measure. However, the court ruled that the lawsuit failed to show the necessary urgency to be heard by the high court – rather than on the merits of the argument – and suggested plaintiffs take the case to district court.

Lewis indicated the initiative includes a severability clause that would protect the remainder of the bill if the proposed allocations are deemed unconstitutional.

The legalization for personal use and cultivation provisions of the measure are scheduled to take effect January 1, while commercial sales would become law on or by October 1.

Originally Published on 2020 11 06 by TG Branfalt |

Thank you for joining us today for our latest news post. If you have any questions or comments about this post, we’d love to hear from you in the comments! Join the newsletter to stay up to date on the latest Industry News and keep an eye out for our next news article!

Disclaimer: This content was sourced from and republished to our website to add value and additional content for our readers. In order to maintain the safety, functionality, and integrity of, the sourced content may have been altered. To access the original content, please click the link below:


Share on email
Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on pinterest
Share on linkedin
Share on reddit
Share on tumblr
The Editor

The Editor is the internet's largest CBD stores directory. Browse 100s of CBD businesses, find CBD near you, and more!
  • Comments are closed.
  • Sign Up For Our Newsletter

    Stay informed with the latest articles on our CBD blog

    Related Posts

    CBD hemp oil, Hand holding bottle of Cannabis oil against Marijuana plant. Herbal Treatment, Alternative Medicine

    How CBD Can Help You

    With more and more CBD products entering the market every year, the CBD industry is growing at a rapid pace. The industry is projected to

    Pin It on Pinterest